Billboard Permit Fraud

25 Richmond Street: Pattison Outdoor Lies, Planning Department Says OK

Thursday, September 11th, 2008 ::: 1 Comment

All the billboards at 25 Richmond Street East are currently illegal. We showed you why in The Goings on at 25 Richmond Street East.

They weren’t always illegal - they just started off and ended up that way.
In April 1995, Gould Outdoor, a predecessor company of Pattison Outdoor applied for a permit to build two 10x’20′ [...]

Illegal Cieslok Backlight: Wellington and Peter Street

Monday, September 1st, 2008 ::: No Comments

Back in the day, the day Danny Starnino still lives in, third party ground signs were required to be separated from third party pedestal signs by 15 metres, but the separation requirement did not apply to signs on different street frontages. That by-law was changed in the early 1990s, so that by 1994, when Starnino [...]

Buildings Department Issues Illegal Billboard Permit in Leslieville

Monday, August 25th, 2008 ::: 2 Comments

The permit for this sign at 1156 Queen St East was obtained by Andrew Sim of Motomedia.  In order to obtain the permit, Sim had to file false information with respect to Separation of Signs. He falsely attested that the fascia sign at 1156 Queen Street East was not located within 60 metres of another [...]

More Abcon Lies as Les Abro and John McMulkin Lie to the Buildings Department to Obtain Another Illegal Permit

Friday, July 11th, 2008 ::: No Comments

And long after the Buildings Department first became aware the outdoor advertising companies were submitting false information to obtain illegal permits, they believed Abcon’s lies.
This is Abcon’s sign at 31 Widmer:

Here’s how Abcon obtained a permit for this sign. Zoning examiner Elvira Cerruto (whose manifest devil-may-care insouciance towards zoning by-laws we previously examined here and [...]

Building Inspector Kelso Botches Inspection of Illegal Billboard Permit at 672 Dupont Street

Thursday, July 10th, 2008 ::: No Comments

On the right is Pattison’s fascia sign at 672 Dupont Street:

There are three problems with the sign, which is on the north elevation of the building, facing Christie. Firstly, it is too high. Signs on this part of Dupont Street are limited to 10 metres from grade, and the variance granted to the sign permits [...]