City Council Adopts Billboard Tax and Comprehensive New Signs By-Law

It was a fantastic day at City Council and someday we should let you know the inside scoop of how a rag tag team of public space and arts activists beat a murder of high priced billboard lobbyists and convinced City Council to adopt the Buildings Departments’ recommendations to adopt a $10.4 Million billboard tax and new by-law to regulate billboards.

Mondoville, Torontoist, Spacing Wire (Post 1 and Post2), NOW, EYE, The Star and BlogTO has  coverage of what happened.

Mayor David Miller has the best quote:

Here’s what we got in a nutshell:

  • This by-law is so restrictive on new billboards that there will hardly be a decent place left to build a new billboard in the City of Toronto;
  • The fines are so high that once the Chief Building Official declares a billboard illegal, we expect it gone pretty quickly if the CBO is serious;
  • The tax, at $10.4 Million is a very good amount. There are scores roof signs in Scarborough and Etobicoke that will be uneconomical to operate under this tax.
  • The variance process will require a variance to be approved by a quazi-judicial body; if the variance is approved, the application could be bumped to to require City Council approval. If the variance is rejected, an application to Council cannot be made.

With the high level of billboard attrition in Toronto due to the growth of the City, the by-laws that City Council passed today could cut the number of Toronto’s billboards in half over twenty five years. That is, if it lasts the test of time. Already, during the Council debate, a Councillor suggested that a new administration could undo these by-laws. That’s why elections are so important.

Next: we expect a concerted attempt at tax evasion and a court challenge to the Ontario Superior Court that the industry is likely to launch. We’ll bring that trial to you, lie by perjurious lie.




Councillor Karen Stintz Laughs it up With Four Billboard Lobbyists

Last week, City Council put off the Sign By-Law and Billboard Tax debate until 10am Monday morning while it considered other business. In the meantime, City Council’s public gallery was packed with billboard lobbyists and activists.

From time to time, City Councillors would chat with members of the public as well as the industry’s paid lobbyists. But one City Councillor only spoke to the lobbyists. Her name is Karen Stintz. And we have the video to prove it:

The silent video hits high drama at 0:33, when Stintz’ animation gets a tad wild.

In that video you can see, starting from Karen Stintz’ left:

Chris Korwin-Kuczynski: Advising OMAC and Pattison, he is the man who successfully banned the Barenaked Ladies from Nathan Philips Square when he was a City Councillor; Paul “School Killer” Christie, also advising both OMAC and Pattison; Stephen McGregor of CBS Outdoor and Sid Catalano of Pattison.

You may remember Karen Stintz from this Spacing Wire expose:  Karen Stintz, Billboards, and how to get around the Lobbyist Registry, a blog post that one City Councillor said was “widely distributed and quite well enjoyed around City Council.” But it was Torontoist who said it most presciently in December 2006 when it wrote:

Karen Stintz is the worst of a very questionable bunch. She may be the most articulate and witty member of Council’s unofficial opposition (goodness knows she doesn’t have much competition), but her positions rarely seem authentically her own but rather products of ideology or focused lobbying efforts. (Almost every time I have attended a Council meeting, I have seen her at the back of the gallery chatting away with lobbyists.)

A free box of sanitizers for the Councillor for Ward 16.

On Monday, follow the Council debate on Twitter at #TOCouncil and view the live video feed at Rogerstv.com.




City Council to Consider Signs By-Law on Friday Between 10am and Sundown

So it’s about time the billboard industry read the writing on the wall instead of putting it there without a permit.

Follow the debate on Twitter at #TOCouncil and view the live video feed at Rogerstv.com.




City Council to Resume Debate on Signs By-Law This Afternoon or Friday

Yesterday City Council debated the new Signs By-Law and Billboard Tax for about 4 hours until the debate was adjourned to deal with ice rink time allocation. The best place to follow what is happening is at the #TOCouncil hashtag on Twitter, where we will be contributing updates.

We expect the debate to continue either later this afternoon, or, most likely, on Friday.

The debate has been going well. It looks as if Council will adopt the Signs By-Law. The major debate will be over the level of the tax. There is a proposal from Councillor Norm Kelly to cut the tax rate in half.

There are other motions on the table regarding the Signs by-law that are very worrisome, although they have a lesser chance of passing.

This motion from Kelly would permit as-of-right “static” LED video screens in every ward.

This motion from Councillor Mammoliti would strip the Emory Village area of any meaningful regulations on billboards, including allowing an unlimited number of “static” LED video screens. However, it would require property owners to obtain approval from “Emory Village BIA Sign Committee” before building a sign. Blair Murdoch of All-Vision Canada has an exclusive agreement with Emory Village BIA to provide billboard leasing services which explains why Blair was busy at City Hall yesterday. This motion from Councillor Moscoe would refer Mammoliti’s motion to staff for a report.

We are asking City Council to reject the Kelly motion and adopt the Moscoe motion.




Billboard Industry Uses Illegal Billboards to Promote CityBillboardTax.ca

How fitting. We have discovered that the Out of Home Marketing Association is using illegal billboards to promote CityBillboardTax.ca.

For example, take this Titan Outdoor vinyl fascia sign at 76 Church Street:

We filed a complaint against this sign in late 2003. In June 2006, this permit to paint a mural sign was issued to 76 Church Street. In lieu of painting a legal sign, Titan built a vinyl sign. In response, Municipal Licensing and Standards issued this Notice of Violation:


According to page 9 of this staff report [PDF], Municipal Licensing and Standards considers the sign illegal because it is a “Fascia being operated under mural permit.”

In addition to the illegal billboard OMAC is using at 76 Church Street, OMAC is using this illegal billboard at 1163 St Clair Avenue West, at Dufferin:

We wrote about this illegal billboard in January. According to Page 4 of this Staff Report [PDF], the sign obtained a 1 year permission in 2002 and “On basis of the said conditions, the property owner was required to remove the sign by August 28, 2003, i.e., one year after the date when the building permit for the sign was issued. The sign remains on the property.”

Folllow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/illegalsigns